Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1608

reference
454-tree-1
name
1608
tree-preservation-order

undefined

454-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.044733 50.883718)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.044549 50.883698,-1.044557 50.883734,-1.044583 50.883767,-1.044623 50.883793,-1.044674 50.883810,-1.044731 50.883816,-1.044789 50.883811,-1.044840 50.883795,-1.044882 50.883770,-1.044909 50.883737,-1.044918 50.883701,-1.044910 50.883665,-1.044885 50.883632,-1.044844 50.883606,-1.044793 50.883589,-1.044736 50.883583,-1.044679 50.883588,-1.044627 50.883604,-1.044586 50.883630,-1.044559 50.883662,-1.044549 50.883698)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL